<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lawsuit Settlement Funding &#124; Litigation Finance &#124; Settlement Cash Advance &#187; Litigation Funding</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit%20settlement/litigation-funding/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 22:49:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=abc</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Chicago Nursing Home Inspections May Be Compromised</title>
		<link>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/chicago-nursing-home-inspections-may-be-compromised/</link>
		<comments>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/chicago-nursing-home-inspections-may-be-compromised/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 18:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical lawsuit funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/09/chicago_nursing_home_inspectio.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A series of articles by the <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/">Chicago Tribune</a> on the poor state of Illinois nursing homes has prompted public action, the latest of which is an increase in surprise inspections to local nursing homes by state officials.  Surprise inspections are key in maintaining a safe and healthy environment for nursing home residents and protecting against instances of <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337425.html">Illinois nursing home abuse</a>.  These investigations ensure that Illinois nursing homes are up to state standards and represent a safe environment for their residents.  </p>

<p><img alt="Wheelchair%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Wheelchair%201.jpg" width="131" height="158">However, a <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2010-09-01/health/ct-met-inspection-leaks-20100901_1_nursing-home-state-long-term-care-ombudsman-david-vinkler">recent Chicago Tribune article</a> has uncovered further information that suggests Illinois nursing homes are not as safe as these investigations indicate.  According to the article's sources, several Chicago area nursing homes have possibly been tipped off that their facilities were going to be investigated, giving them time to prepare for the 'surprise' inspection.  Those facilities that were aware of the pending inspections supposedly increased the staff and presented a false image of the facilities on the date of inspection.  </p>

<p>Traditional <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337425.html">Illinois nursing home abuse cases</a> focus on negligence or abuse by the nursing home and often are a result of inadequate care by the nursing home staff.  For example, one common nursing home negligence claim is that the nursing home failed to prevent the development and spread of decubitus ulcers, also known as pressure sores.  There is a high incidence of pressure sores developing in bedridden patients or patients with limited mobility, a category which a high number of nursing home residents fall into.  </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A series of articles by the <a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/">Chicago Tribune</a> on the poor state of Illinois nursing homes has prompted public action, the latest of which is an increase in surprise inspections to local nursing homes by state officials.  Surprise inspections are key in maintaining a safe and healthy environment for nursing home residents and protecting against instances of <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337425.html">Illinois nursing home abuse</a>.  These investigations ensure that Illinois nursing homes are up to state standards and represent a safe environment for their residents.  </p>

<p><img alt="Wheelchair%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Wheelchair%201.jpg" width="131" height="158" align="right"/>However, a <a href="http://articles.chicagotribune.com/2010-09-01/health/ct-met-inspection-leaks-20100901_1_nursing-home-state-long-term-care-ombudsman-david-vinkler">recent Chicago Tribune article</a> has uncovered further information that suggests Illinois nursing homes are not as safe as these investigations indicate.  According to the article's sources, several Chicago area nursing homes have possibly been tipped off that their facilities were going to be investigated, giving them time to prepare for the 'surprise' inspection.  Those facilities that were aware of the pending inspections supposedly increased the staff and presented a false image of the facilities on the date of inspection.  </p>

<p>Traditional <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337425.html">Illinois nursing home abuse cases</a> focus on negligence or abuse by the nursing home and often are a result of inadequate care by the nursing home staff.  For example, one common nursing home negligence claim is that the nursing home failed to prevent the development and spread of decubitus ulcers, also known as pressure sores.  There is a high incidence of pressure sores developing in bedridden patients or patients with limited mobility, a category which a high number of nursing home residents fall into.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/chicago-nursing-home-inspections-may-be-compromised/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cook County Court Rejects Plaintiff&#8217;s Inadequate Security Claim &#8211; Sanchez v. Wilmette Real Estate &amp; Management Co.</title>
		<link>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/cook-county-court-rejects-plaintiffs-inadequate-security-claim-sanchez-v-wilmette-real-estate-management-co/</link>
		<comments>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/cook-county-court-rejects-plaintiffs-inadequate-security-claim-sanchez-v-wilmette-real-estate-management-co/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:44:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical lawsuit funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/08/cook_county_court_rejects_plai_1.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Most people would consider feeling safe in one's home or apartment to be a high priority.  If that safety is violated, whether through an attack or <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337441.html">inadequate security</a>, most people would look to the building owner or manufacturer for a failure to maintain a safe living environment.  However, in <em>Robert Sanchez v. Wilmette Real Estate and Management Co., et al.</em>, No. 1-08-0248, the Illinois court ruled that the building owner and manufacturer did not owe the plaintiff a duty to protect him from being attacked on its premises.  </p>

<p><img alt="Pick%20Lock%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Pick%20Lock%201.jpg" width="138" height="118">At the time of the attack Sanchez was living at an apartment complex owned by BHC5900 and managed by Wilmette Real Estate and Management Company.  The plaintiff was walking towards his apartment when he was attacked by an unknown assailant who had been hiding in a vacant apartment within the complex.  </p>

<p>Sanchez accused the defendants of leaving vacant units unlocked, a practice that made it easy for his assailant to hide undetected prior to the attack.  However, the defendants denied this practice and further denied any breached duty towards the plaintiff.  A trial court agreed with the defendants and granted their motion for summary judgment, dismissing them from the <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337441.html">Illinois inadequate security lawsuit</a>.  </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most people would consider feeling safe in one's home or apartment to be a high priority.  If that safety is violated, whether through an attack or <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337441.html">inadequate security</a>, most people would look to the building owner or manufacturer for a failure to maintain a safe living environment.  However, in <em>Robert Sanchez v. Wilmette Real Estate and Management Co., et al.</em>, No. 1-08-0248, the Illinois court ruled that the building owner and manufacturer did not owe the plaintiff a duty to protect him from being attacked on its premises.  </p>

<p><img alt="Pick%20Lock%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Pick%20Lock%201.jpg" width="138" height="118" align="left"/>At the time of the attack Sanchez was living at an apartment complex owned by BHC5900 and managed by Wilmette Real Estate and Management Company.  The plaintiff was walking towards his apartment when he was attacked by an unknown assailant who had been hiding in a vacant apartment within the complex.  </p>

<p>Sanchez accused the defendants of leaving vacant units unlocked, a practice that made it easy for his assailant to hide undetected prior to the attack.  However, the defendants denied this practice and further denied any breached duty towards the plaintiff.  A trial court agreed with the defendants and granted their motion for summary judgment, dismissing them from the <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337441.html">Illinois inadequate security lawsuit</a>.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/cook-county-court-rejects-plaintiffs-inadequate-security-claim-sanchez-v-wilmette-real-estate-management-co/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois Pharmacy&#8217;s Duty to Warn Customers of Drug Interactions Examined By Illinois Appellate Court &#8211; DiGiovanni v. Albertson&#8217;s, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/illinois-pharmacys-duty-to-warn-customers-of-drug-interactions-examined-by-illinois-appellate-court-digiovanni-v-albertsons-inc/</link>
		<comments>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/illinois-pharmacys-duty-to-warn-customers-of-drug-interactions-examined-by-illinois-appellate-court-digiovanni-v-albertsons-inc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical lawsuit funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/08/illinois_pharmacys_duty_to_war_1.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent Illinois Appellate Court case reviewed what a drug store's duty is to its customers regarding possible drug interactions in an <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337433.html">Illinois pharmaceutical lawsuit</a>.  In <a href="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/DiGiovanni%20v%20Albertsons.pdf">em&#62;DiGiovanni v. Albertson's, Inc.</em>, No. 04 L 3580</a>, the decedent's estate alleged that the pharmacy had a duty to warn the decedent about a possible interaction between her two prescribed medications, an interaction that eventually caused her death.  However, both the Cook County trial court and the appellate court agreed that the pharmacy did not have a duty to warn the customer of the possible drug interaction in the present <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337433.html">pharmaceutical malpractice case</a>.</p>

<p><img alt="Pill%20Bottle%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Pill%20Bottle%201.jpg" width="161" height="114">The decedent had been prescribed <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0000657">Tenoretic</a>, a medication to treat high blood pressure, by her longtime doctor, Dr. Shastri.  When filling the prescription the pharmacy noted that Tenoretic could interact with lithium, which the decedent was also taking to treat her manic depression.  Upon noting the possible interaction the pharmacist called Dr. Shastri, who had prescribed both medications, to determine whether he should continue to fill both prescriptions.  Dr. Shastri directly told the pharmacist to fill the prescriptions and stated that he would monitor the decedent for possible interactions.</p>

<p>The following week DiGiovanni returned to the same pharmacy for a prescription refill of the same medications.  At the time a different pharmacist again noted the possibility of a drug interaction between the two medications.  However, the pharmacist refilled both prescriptions after reviewing a note on the decedent's file indicating that her doctor would be monitoring her for possible drug interactions.  </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent Illinois Appellate Court case reviewed what a drug store's duty is to its customers regarding possible drug interactions in an <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337433.html">Illinois pharmaceutical lawsuit</a>.  In <a href="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/DiGiovanni%20v%20Albertsons.pdf">em>DiGiovanni v. Albertson's, Inc.</em>, No. 04 L 3580</a>, the decedent's estate alleged that the pharmacy had a duty to warn the decedent about a possible interaction between her two prescribed medications, an interaction that eventually caused her death.  However, both the Cook County trial court and the appellate court agreed that the pharmacy did not have a duty to warn the customer of the possible drug interaction in the present <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337433.html">pharmaceutical malpractice case</a>.</p>

<p><img alt="Pill%20Bottle%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Pill%20Bottle%201.jpg" width="161" height="114" align="right"/>The decedent had been prescribed <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0000657">Tenoretic</a>, a medication to treat high blood pressure, by her longtime doctor, Dr. Shastri.  When filling the prescription the pharmacy noted that Tenoretic could interact with lithium, which the decedent was also taking to treat her manic depression.  Upon noting the possible interaction the pharmacist called Dr. Shastri, who had prescribed both medications, to determine whether he should continue to fill both prescriptions.  Dr. Shastri directly told the pharmacist to fill the prescriptions and stated that he would monitor the decedent for possible interactions.</p>

<p>The following week DiGiovanni returned to the same pharmacy for a prescription refill of the same medications.  At the time a different pharmacist again noted the possibility of a drug interaction between the two medications.  However, the pharmacist refilled both prescriptions after reviewing a note on the decedent's file indicating that her doctor would be monitoring her for possible drug interactions.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/illinois-pharmacys-duty-to-warn-customers-of-drug-interactions-examined-by-illinois-appellate-court-digiovanni-v-albertsons-inc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois Pharmacy&#8217;s Duty to Warn Customers of Drug Interactions Examined By Illinois Appellate Court &#8211; DiGiovanni v. Albertson&#8217;s, Inc.</title>
		<link>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/illinois-pharmacys-duty-to-warn-customers-of-drug-interactions-examined-by-illinois-appellate-court-digiovanni-v-albertsons-inc-2/</link>
		<comments>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/illinois-pharmacys-duty-to-warn-customers-of-drug-interactions-examined-by-illinois-appellate-court-digiovanni-v-albertsons-inc-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 17:02:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical lawsuit funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/08/illinois_pharmacys_duty_to_war.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent Illinois Appellate Court case reviewed what a drug store's duty is to its customers regarding possible drug interactions in an <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337433.html">Illinois pharmaceutical lawsuit</a>.  In <a href="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/DiGiovanni%20v%20Albertsons.pdf"><em>DiGiovanni v. Albertson's, Inc.</em>, No. 04 L 3580</a>, the decedent's estate alleged that the pharmacy had a duty to warn the decedent about a possible interaction between her two prescribed medications, an interaction that eventually caused her death.  However, both the Cook County trial court and the appellate court agreed that the pharmacy did not have a duty to warn the customer of the possible drug interaction in the present <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337433.html">pharmaceutical malpractice case</a>.</p>

<p><img alt="Pill%20Bottle%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Pill%20Bottle%201.jpg" width="161" height="114">The decedent had been prescribed <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0000657">Tenoretic</a>, a medication to treat high blood pressure, by her longtime doctor, Dr. Shastri.  When filling the prescription the pharmacy noted that Tenoretic could interact with lithium, which the decedent was also taking to treat her manic depression.  Upon noting the possible interaction the pharmacist called Dr. Shastri, who had prescribed both medications, to determine whether he should continue to fill both prescriptions.  Dr. Shastri directly told the pharmacist to fill the prescriptions and stated that he would monitor the decedent for possible interactions.</p>

<p>The following week DiGiovanni returned to the same pharmacy for a prescription refill of the same medications.  At the time a different pharmacist again noted the possibility of a drug interaction between the two medications.  However, the pharmacist refilled both prescriptions after reviewing a note on the decedent's file indicating that her doctor would be monitoring her for possible drug interactions.  </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent Illinois Appellate Court case reviewed what a drug store's duty is to its customers regarding possible drug interactions in an <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337433.html">Illinois pharmaceutical lawsuit</a>.  In <a href="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/DiGiovanni%20v%20Albertsons.pdf"><em>DiGiovanni v. Albertson's, Inc.</em>, No. 04 L 3580</a>, the decedent's estate alleged that the pharmacy had a duty to warn the decedent about a possible interaction between her two prescribed medications, an interaction that eventually caused her death.  However, both the Cook County trial court and the appellate court agreed that the pharmacy did not have a duty to warn the customer of the possible drug interaction in the present <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337433.html">pharmaceutical malpractice case</a>.</p>

<p><img alt="Pill%20Bottle%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Pill%20Bottle%201.jpg" width="161" height="114" align="right"/>The decedent had been prescribed <a href="http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedhealth/PMH0000657">Tenoretic</a>, a medication to treat high blood pressure, by her longtime doctor, Dr. Shastri.  When filling the prescription the pharmacy noted that Tenoretic could interact with lithium, which the decedent was also taking to treat her manic depression.  Upon noting the possible interaction the pharmacist called Dr. Shastri, who had prescribed both medications, to determine whether he should continue to fill both prescriptions.  Dr. Shastri directly told the pharmacist to fill the prescriptions and stated that he would monitor the decedent for possible interactions.</p>

<p>The following week DiGiovanni returned to the same pharmacy for a prescription refill of the same medications.  At the time a different pharmacist again noted the possibility of a drug interaction between the two medications.  However, the pharmacist refilled both prescriptions after reviewing a note on the decedent's file indicating that her doctor would be monitoring her for possible drug interactions.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/illinois-pharmacys-duty-to-warn-customers-of-drug-interactions-examined-by-illinois-appellate-court-digiovanni-v-albertsons-inc-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fatal Illinois Highway Accident Case Settles for $5 Million &#8211; Estate of Heinz v. Messel, et al.</title>
		<link>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/fatal-illinois-highway-accident-case-settles-for-5-million-estate-of-heinz-v-messel-et-al/</link>
		<comments>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/fatal-illinois-highway-accident-case-settles-for-5-million-estate-of-heinz-v-messel-et-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical lawsuit funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/08/fatal_highway_accident_case_se.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1344040.html">Illinois wrongful death case</a> recently settled in Will County for $5 million.  The case was brought by the estate of a 57 year-old married mother of two adult children after she was killed in an <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">Illinois auto accident</a>.  <em>Estate of Heinz v. Messel, et al.</em>, No. 07 L 0090.</p>

<p><img alt="Grass%20Median1.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Grass%20Median1.jpg" width="143" height="97">The highway crash took place on I-55, a highway connecting Chicago to St. Louis.  The decedent driver was traveling northbound on the highway in the area of the Plainfield Township when a car driving southbound crossed the grassy median separating the different directions of traffic and crashed into the woman's vehicle.  The <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">head-on crash</a> caused the decedent's car to flip over and land in a ditch off to the side of the highway.</p>

<p>An investigation of the accident revealed that the at fault driver was intoxicated at the time of the <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">Illinois car crash</a>.  Whenever an Illinois car accident involves a <a href="http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/publications/pdf_publications/dsd_a118.pdf">DUI</a>, the Illinois state's attorney can bring his/her own criminal charges against the offending driver.  Presumably some sort of action was taken in response to the fatal car accident; however, the criminal action would have been completely separate from the civil action involving the wrongful death claims.  </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1344040.html">Illinois wrongful death case</a> recently settled in Will County for $5 million.  The case was brought by the estate of a 57 year-old married mother of two adult children after she was killed in an <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">Illinois auto accident</a>.  <em>Estate of Heinz v. Messel, et al.</em>, No. 07 L 0090.</p>

<p><img alt="Grass%20Median1.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Grass%20Median1.jpg" width="143" height="97" align="left"/>The highway crash took place on I-55, a highway connecting Chicago to St. Louis.  The decedent driver was traveling northbound on the highway in the area of the Plainfield Township when a car driving southbound crossed the grassy median separating the different directions of traffic and crashed into the woman's vehicle.  The <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">head-on crash</a> caused the decedent's car to flip over and land in a ditch off to the side of the highway.</p>

<p>An investigation of the accident revealed that the at fault driver was intoxicated at the time of the <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">Illinois car crash</a>.  Whenever an Illinois car accident involves a <a href="http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/publications/pdf_publications/dsd_a118.pdf">DUI</a>, the Illinois state's attorney can bring his/her own criminal charges against the offending driver.  Presumably some sort of action was taken in response to the fatal car accident; however, the criminal action would have been completely separate from the civil action involving the wrongful death claims.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/fatal-illinois-highway-accident-case-settles-for-5-million-estate-of-heinz-v-messel-et-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fatal Illinois Highway Accident Case Settles for $5 Million &#8211; Estate of Heinz v. Messel, et al.</title>
		<link>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/fatal-illinois-highway-accident-case-settles-for-5-million-estate-of-heinz-v-messel-et-al-2/</link>
		<comments>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/fatal-illinois-highway-accident-case-settles-for-5-million-estate-of-heinz-v-messel-et-al-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Aug 2010 17:35:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical lawsuit funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/08/fatal_illinois_highway_acciden.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1344040.html">Illinois wrongful death case</a> recently settled in Will County for $5 million.  The case was brought by the estate of a 57 year-old married mother of two adult children after she was killed in an <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">Illinois auto accident</a>.  <em>Estate of Heinz v. Messel, et al.</em>, No. 07 L 0090.</p>

<p><img alt="Grass%20Median1.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Grass%20Median1.jpg" width="143" height="97">The highway crash took place on I-55, a highway connecting Chicago to St. Louis.  The decedent driver was traveling northbound on the highway in the area of the Plainfield Township when a car driving southbound crossed the grassy median separating the different directions of traffic and crashed into the woman's vehicle.  The <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">head-on crash</a> caused the decedent's car to flip over and land in a ditch off to the side of the highway.</p>

<p>An investigation of the accident revealed that the at fault driver was intoxicated at the time of the <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">Illinois car crash</a>.  Whenever an Illinois car accident involves a <a href="http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/publications/pdf_publications/dsd_a118.pdf">DUI</a>, the Illinois state's attorney can bring his/her own criminal charges against the offending driver.  Under Illinois law, a person may be deemed intoxicated if their blood alcohol content (BAC) is measured at .08 or higher.  Presumably some sort of action was taken in response to the fatal car accident; however, the criminal action would have been completely separate from the civil action involving the wrongful death claims.  </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>An <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1344040.html">Illinois wrongful death case</a> recently settled in Will County for $5 million.  The case was brought by the estate of a 57 year-old married mother of two adult children after she was killed in an <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">Illinois auto accident</a>.  <em>Estate of Heinz v. Messel, et al.</em>, No. 07 L 0090.</p>

<p><img alt="Grass%20Median1.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Grass%20Median1.jpg" width="143" height="97" align="left"/>The highway crash took place on I-55, a highway connecting Chicago to St. Louis.  The decedent driver was traveling northbound on the highway in the area of the Plainfield Township when a car driving southbound crossed the grassy median separating the different directions of traffic and crashed into the woman's vehicle.  The <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">head-on crash</a> caused the decedent's car to flip over and land in a ditch off to the side of the highway.</p>

<p>An investigation of the accident revealed that the at fault driver was intoxicated at the time of the <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">Illinois car crash</a>.  Whenever an Illinois car accident involves a <a href="http://www.cyberdriveillinois.com/publications/pdf_publications/dsd_a118.pdf">DUI</a>, the Illinois state's attorney can bring his/her own criminal charges against the offending driver.  Under Illinois law, a person may be deemed intoxicated if their blood alcohol content (BAC) is measured at .08 or higher.  Presumably some sort of action was taken in response to the fatal car accident; however, the criminal action would have been completely separate from the civil action involving the wrongful death claims.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/fatal-illinois-highway-accident-case-settles-for-5-million-estate-of-heinz-v-messel-et-al-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois Car Crash and Medical Malpractice Combo Case Settles for $1.9 Million &#8211; Khourny v. Sarmed Elias, M.D., et al.</title>
		<link>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/illinois-car-crash-and-medical-malpractice-combo-case-settles-for-1-9-million-khourny-v-sarmed-elias-m-d-et-al/</link>
		<comments>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/illinois-car-crash-and-medical-malpractice-combo-case-settles-for-1-9-million-khourny-v-sarmed-elias-m-d-et-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Aug 2010 17:10:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical lawsuit funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/08/illinois_car_crash_and_medical.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Many people's circumstances never require them to file one lawsuit, let alone two.  Yet within the span of four months Jihan Khourny was injured on two different occasions, leading to her filing two different, but related lawsuits - one being an <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331869.html">Illinois personal injury lawsuit</a>, the other an <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331861.html">Illinois medical malpractice lawsuit</a>.  Both cases recently settled for a combination of $1.9 million.  <em>Khourny v. Sarmed Elias, M.D., et al.</em>, No. 07 L 3871.</p>

<p><img alt="Neck%20Brace%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Neck%20Brace%201.jpg" width="155" height="103">The personal injury claim arose from a car crash that occurred in Elgin, Illinois.  Khourny was driving along Route 31 when she was hit by another car.  The <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">Illinois car accident lawsuit </a>was brought against the driver of the other vehicle and settled for $100,000.  The plaintiff was claiming property damage to her vehicle and a neck injury as a result of the <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">car accident</a>.</p>

<p>Shortly after the accident Khourny began seeking medical treatment for her neck injury.  Her doctor recommended she try <a href="http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/cortisone-shots/MY00268">cortisone injections</a> as part of her treatment plan.  Cortisone injections are typically given to relieve inflammation and pain and are used for a wide variety of complaints, including arthritis, tendinitis, and carpal tunnel syndrome. </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many people's circumstances never require them to file one lawsuit, let alone two.  Yet within the span of four months Jihan Khourny was injured on two different occasions, leading to her filing two different, but related lawsuits - one being an <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331869.html">Illinois personal injury lawsuit</a>, the other an <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331861.html">Illinois medical malpractice lawsuit</a>.  Both cases recently settled for a combination of $1.9 million.  <em>Khourny v. Sarmed Elias, M.D., et al.</em>, No. 07 L 3871.</p>

<p><img alt="Neck%20Brace%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Neck%20Brace%201.jpg" width="155" height="103" align="right"/>The personal injury claim arose from a car crash that occurred in Elgin, Illinois.  Khourny was driving along Route 31 when she was hit by another car.  The <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">Illinois car accident lawsuit </a>was brought against the driver of the other vehicle and settled for $100,000.  The plaintiff was claiming property damage to her vehicle and a neck injury as a result of the <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1337437.html">car accident</a>.</p>

<p>Shortly after the accident Khourny began seeking medical treatment for her neck injury.  Her doctor recommended she try <a href="http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/cortisone-shots/MY00268">cortisone injections</a> as part of her treatment plan.  Cortisone injections are typically given to relieve inflammation and pain and are used for a wide variety of complaints, including arthritis, tendinitis, and carpal tunnel syndrome. </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/illinois-car-crash-and-medical-malpractice-combo-case-settles-for-1-9-million-khourny-v-sarmed-elias-m-d-et-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blagojevich Trial Ends:  Illinois Jury Finds The Ex-Governor Guilty of Only 1 of 24 Counts</title>
		<link>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/blagojevich-trial-ends-illinois-jury-finds-the-ex-governor-guilty-of-only-1-of-24-counts/</link>
		<comments>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/blagojevich-trial-ends-illinois-jury-finds-the-ex-governor-guilty-of-only-1-of-24-counts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 18:41:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical lawsuit funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/08/blagojevich_trial_ends_illinoi_1.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday <a href="http://www.thepublicityagency.com/rod-blagojevich/index.htm">former Illinois governor Rob Blagojevich</a> was found guilty of lying to FBI agents about his involvement in campaign fundraising.  The jury could not agree on the remaining 23 felony counts brought against Blagojevich by the government, including charges of trying to profit from Obama's former Senate seat.  </p>

<p><img alt="IL%20State%20Seal%203.gif" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/IL%20State%20Seal%203.gif" width="135" height="134">Prosecutors intend on retrying Blagojevich on those 23 additional counts on which the deadlocked jury was unable to agree.  Because the jury was unable to unanimously agree on those counts there was a mistrial regarding those counts.  Legally this means that the former governor can be retried on them and still be found guilty.  However, if the jury had found him not guilty on any counts, which it did not, then those felony charges would be barred from further prosecution.  </p>

<p>The current conviction carries a maximum of five years in prison; however, the official sentencing is unlikely to occur before the retrial.  If Blagojevich ends up being convicted of all the felony counts against him then he faces up to 415 years in prison and up to $6 million in fines.  </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yesterday <a href="http://www.thepublicityagency.com/rod-blagojevich/index.htm">former Illinois governor Rob Blagojevich</a> was found guilty of lying to FBI agents about his involvement in campaign fundraising.  The jury could not agree on the remaining 23 felony counts brought against Blagojevich by the government, including charges of trying to profit from Obama's former Senate seat.  </p>

<p><img alt="IL%20State%20Seal%203.gif" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/IL%20State%20Seal%203.gif" width="135" height="134" align="left"/>Prosecutors intend on retrying Blagojevich on those 23 additional counts on which the deadlocked jury was unable to agree.  Because the jury was unable to unanimously agree on those counts there was a mistrial regarding those counts.  Legally this means that the former governor can be retried on them and still be found guilty.  However, if the jury had found him not guilty on any counts, which it did not, then those felony charges would be barred from further prosecution.  </p>

<p>The current conviction carries a maximum of five years in prison; however, the official sentencing is unlikely to occur before the retrial.  If Blagojevich ends up being convicted of all the felony counts against him then he faces up to 415 years in prison and up to $6 million in fines.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/blagojevich-trial-ends-illinois-jury-finds-the-ex-governor-guilty-of-only-1-of-24-counts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Illinois &#8216;Popcorn Lung&#8217; Case Receives $30.4 Million From Cook County Jury &#8211; Solis v. BASF Corp.</title>
		<link>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/illinois-popcorn-lung-case-receives-30-4-million-from-cook-county-jury-solis-v-basf-corp/</link>
		<comments>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/illinois-popcorn-lung-case-receives-30-4-million-from-cook-county-jury-solis-v-basf-corp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Aug 2010 21:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical lawsuit funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/08/illinois_popcorn_lung_case_rec.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>A recent <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331869.html">Illinois personal injury lawsuit</a> received a large verdict award, granting $30.4 million to the plaintiff in <em>Solis v. BASF Corp.</em>, No. 06 L 12105.  Several other parties to the <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331869.html">Illinois work place injury lawsuit</a> had settled with the plaintiff prior to trial for undisclosed amounts, but BASF Corp. opted to take the case to trial rather than settling.  The supply company's gamble failed, as evidenced by the positive plaintiff verdict.</p>

<p><img alt="Popcorn%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Popcorn%201.jpg" width="148" height="134">In <em>Solis</em>, the plaintiff developed <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/flavorings/pdfs/bo-worker-fact-sheet.pdf">bronchiolitis obliterans</a>, or 'popcorn lung disease', after 18 years of working in various factories. Bronchiolitis obliterans has been linked to exposure to substances used to make microwave popcorn, such as diacetyl.  </p>

<p>After being diagnosed with the life-threatening disease, Solis now has a reduced lung capacity of only 25 percent.  This means that without a lung transplant the life-long nonsmoker and unmarried father of three could die if he develops the flu or other respiratory diseases.  The 45 year-old Illinois resident brought a <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331869.html">Cook County workplace injury lawsuit</a> against several parties alleging that his current condition was a result of his exposure to fumes and dust particles while working with artificial butter flavoring.  </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A recent <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331869.html">Illinois personal injury lawsuit</a> received a large verdict award, granting $30.4 million to the plaintiff in <em>Solis v. BASF Corp.</em>, No. 06 L 12105.  Several other parties to the <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331869.html">Illinois work place injury lawsuit</a> had settled with the plaintiff prior to trial for undisclosed amounts, but BASF Corp. opted to take the case to trial rather than settling.  The supply company's gamble failed, as evidenced by the positive plaintiff verdict.</p>

<p><img alt="Popcorn%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Popcorn%201.jpg" width="148" height="134" align="right"/>In <em>Solis</em>, the plaintiff developed <a href="http://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/flavorings/pdfs/bo-worker-fact-sheet.pdf">bronchiolitis obliterans</a>, or 'popcorn lung disease', after 18 years of working in various factories. Bronchiolitis obliterans has been linked to exposure to substances used to make microwave popcorn, such as diacetyl.  </p>

<p>After being diagnosed with the life-threatening disease, Solis now has a reduced lung capacity of only 25 percent.  This means that without a lung transplant the life-long nonsmoker and unmarried father of three could die if he develops the flu or other respiratory diseases.  The 45 year-old Illinois resident brought a <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331869.html">Cook County workplace injury lawsuit</a> against several parties alleging that his current condition was a result of his exposure to fumes and dust particles while working with artificial butter flavoring.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/illinois-popcorn-lung-case-receives-30-4-million-from-cook-county-jury-solis-v-basf-corp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cook County Medical Malpractice Settlement Approved for Surgical Negligence in Laparoscopic Tubal Ligation Surgery &#8211; Estate of Yvonne Harris v. Advocate Healthcare Network, et al.</title>
		<link>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/cook-county-medical-malpractice-settlement-approved-for-surgical-negligence-in-laparoscopic-tubal-ligation-surgery-estate-of-yvonne-harris-v-advocate-healthcare-network-et-al/</link>
		<comments>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/cook-county-medical-malpractice-settlement-approved-for-surgical-negligence-in-laparoscopic-tubal-ligation-surgery-estate-of-yvonne-harris-v-advocate-healthcare-network-et-al/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:18:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Chicago Personal Injury Lawyer Blog</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Injury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawsuit loans]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Litigation Funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[medical lawsuit funding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Settlement Funding]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/2010/08/cook_county_medical_malpractic_1.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>While medical advances have made many formerly difficult surgeries routine, there are still dangers with any surgery, especially when anesthesia is involved.  In <em>Estate of Yvonne Harris v. Advocate Healthcare Network, et al.</em>, No. 03 L 6421, <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331861.html">medical negligence</a> during a routine laparoscopic tubal ligation surgery left the decedent with severe brain damage.  An <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331861.html">Illinois medical malpractice settlement</a> totaling $8.95 million was reached between the decedent's estate and the surgeon, anesthesiologist, physician group, and surgical center.  </p>

<p><img alt="Surgical%20instruments%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Surgical%20instruments%201.jpg" width="155" height="107">The healthy, young mother of two presented for the <a href="http://www.acog.org/publications/patient_education/bp035.cfm">laparoscopic tubal ligation surgery</a>, a permanent form of contraception that was supposed to be a simple in and out procedure.  She was given general anesthesia and the procedure began.  However, within five minutes the anesthesiologist noted that she had cardiac arrhythmia, which is an abnormal heart rate, and no blood pressure.  All parties affirmed that the patient had not been getting any oxygen to her brain for several minutes.  </p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331861.html">Illinois medical malpractice lawsuit</a> alleged that the surgeon and anesthesiologist failed to recognize the plaintiff's deprived condition for several minutes, which resulted in her subsequent brain damage.  The patient's abnormal heart rate and lack of blood pressure were a rare complication of the surgery and were thought to be the result of a carbon dioxide embolism.  </p>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While medical advances have made many formerly difficult surgeries routine, there are still dangers with any surgery, especially when anesthesia is involved.  In <em>Estate of Yvonne Harris v. Advocate Healthcare Network, et al.</em>, No. 03 L 6421, <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331861.html">medical negligence</a> during a routine laparoscopic tubal ligation surgery left the decedent with severe brain damage.  An <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331861.html">Illinois medical malpractice settlement</a> totaling $8.95 million was reached between the decedent's estate and the surgeon, anesthesiologist, physician group, and surgical center.  </p>

<p><img alt="Surgical%20instruments%201.jpg" src="http://www.chicago-personal-injury-lawyer-blog.com/Surgical%20instruments%201.jpg" width="155" height="107" align="left"/>The healthy, young mother of two presented for the <a href="http://www.acog.org/publications/patient_education/bp035.cfm">laparoscopic tubal ligation surgery</a>, a permanent form of contraception that was supposed to be a simple in and out procedure.  She was given general anesthesia and the procedure began.  However, within five minutes the anesthesiologist noted that she had cardiac arrhythmia, which is an abnormal heart rate, and no blood pressure.  All parties affirmed that the patient had not been getting any oxygen to her brain for several minutes.  </p>

<p>The <a href="http://www.robertkreisman.com/lawyer-attorney-1331861.html">Illinois medical malpractice lawsuit</a> alleged that the surgeon and anesthesiologist failed to recognize the plaintiff's deprived condition for several minutes, which resulted in her subsequent brain damage.  The patient's abnormal heart rate and lack of blood pressure were a rare complication of the surgery and were thought to be the result of a carbon dioxide embolism.  </p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lawsuit-settlement-funding.com/lawsuit-funding/personal-injury/cook-county-medical-malpractice-settlement-approved-for-surgical-negligence-in-laparoscopic-tubal-ligation-surgery-estate-of-yvonne-harris-v-advocate-healthcare-network-et-al/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
